Just in my lifetime, we've certainly had many instances where we experienced a shared consciousness about the state of our country and our world, and in the moment, they were pretty profound. I can remember waiting with my parents in long gas lines during the oil embargo, being afraid of poisoned Tylenol, and overhearing them complain about an 18% interest rate on our home. I remember being genuinely afraid of a nuclear war breaking out while I was asleep—we had an emergency plan at school specifically related to this possibility—and wondering if my odd next-door neighbor was really a Soviet spy. He had an awful lot of clocks. Like...a lot. My father, who was a radio disc jockey, interviewed me on air about how a nine year old felt about the Iran hostage crisis, with an underlying track of Barbra Streisand singing "Silent Night." (Which is triply weird if you think about it: a Jewish woman singing a Christian song as the background music on a story about an act during an Islamic revolution.) The Alar scare and law suit against CBS, John Lennon's murder, the junk bond scandal, the NYC subway shooting and gun law debate, the biggest one-day drop in Wall Street history (1987, almost 23%), the Challenger space shuttle explosion on live TV, AIDS, our invasion of Panama (huh?), the Exxon Valdez spill, Monica Lewinsky, pipe bomb at the Olympic games in Atlanta, the Rodney King riots, the first Gulf War, the Oklahoma bombing, Ted Kaczinsky, Bosnia, Somalia, Germany, Kuwait, Jimmy Swaggart and prostitutes, Nancy Reagan consulting with psychics, Jesse Jackson negotiating with Syria (double huh??), Dudley Moore in "Arthur II, on the Rocks"...we are accustomed to uneasy times.
What is it that feels so different right now?
Earlier this fall, I watched the Tea Party-sponsored Republican debates. The first real political conversation that I've had the brain power to absorb recently. Don't hold your breath, it was still tough to absorb. No matter what side of the aisle you may be on, or lean towards, I find that most often I am wondering who is really telling the truth. Admittedly, yes, there is a lot of subjective information, as well as different ways of analyzing the same data, but aren't there are also some flat out 'truths,' even if they are somewhat elusive? It's a frustrating experience. I feel like we have become a country where our top line analysis of our candidates is how trustworthy they seem. Isn't that an analysis that is frighteningly flawed? What's objective in trying to weigh the truth in their trustworthiness? Just if they 'seem' like they are telling the truth? Lots of question marks in this paragraph. Ugh. I think if applying the beef is the answer, we may be trying to buy it at Claire's.
It got me thinking about one of my favorite quotes, "Losing an illusion is greater than finding the truth." — Ludwig Borne.
Here are some examples of how I translate that quote on a (let's say) less academic level:
1. It's not that he's unattractive per se, it's that you shouldn't have to have three cocktails to find him so.
2. It's not that you are not a good poker player, it's that being dealt four aces doesn't make you so.
3. It's not that he controls you, it's that you are co-dependent.
4. It's not that she is a former NFL cheerleader and you are getting a lot of action, it's that "She is a former NFL cheerleader and I'm getting a lot of action" was only a slightly altered direct quote.
5. It's not that you can't be spirited and responsible, it's that you are spirited and responsible.
6. It's not that he has OCD, it's that he likes to have control and he has OCD.
7. It's not that #10 was the best running back ever to pose as a QB, it's that my team was the national champ a long time ago. (20 years ago this season, to be exact.)
8. It's not that the Idaho senator does or does not have a wide stance, it's that he thought he was invincible.
9. It's not that he can't make a decision, it's that that's the decision.
10. It's not that she didn't love you, it's that she didn't know how.
The biggest one-day fall in the stock market, ever, was in 1987 — approximately 23%. Numbers 2—8 in the top ten are not in my lifetime (and I'm 11 months shy of my 40th birthday), then there's another one in 1987, and then about an 8% drop in 2008 to round out the top 10. There is a 15 point spread from #1 to #10 on the list, and #10 is the only one during the years of this Great Recession, as I've heard it called. In the 1980s, foreclosure rates went into triple digits and general business failure rates rose, as did inflation, mortgage rates, etc. and yet historically, this is largely seen as a time of strong economic growth and prosperity. I'm not going to pretend like I understand the nuances of all of this, but I'm curious about what the truths (the actual numbers) tell us about our illusions, historical or present? For whom was that a time of growth and prosperity? Don't we have similar illusions today? Has everyone suffered during this Great Recession? Why is it a perceived evil to learn from those who are prospering? What truths do we not talk about in relation to those who are suffering?
In my personal life, I've had many opportunities to reflect on what illusions I have lost and what truths have therefore then been revealed. I think the greatest one is believing that my ex will learn and grow from the experience of the divorce. Not owning that illusion has allowed me to see the truth: maybe he has, maybe he will, but maybe he hasn't and maybe he won't. That truth has allowed me to manage my expectations as a co-parent in a way that I think allows for more grounding, less emotion and therefore, better outcomes. In essence, I bought the steak from the butcher and I am learning how to apply it to the wound.
I think what feels different about these times is that even with the information availability at a historical high, I think we have become more skeptical than analytical. More focused on emotion than objectivity, perhaps buying into more illusion than truth. As usual, I don't have the answers to the big questions I am asking about our government, nor our economy, but I think it feels like a balanced place to start, to question ourselves on some of these very basic ideas. What illusions do we need to lose, what truths will that reveal and then maybe we will be better prepared to say, 'Where's the beef?'